Modern Slavery in Supply Chains: Why Australia Must Strengthen Its Laws

WHAT IS MODERN SLAVERY AND WHY SHOULD AUSTRALIA ACT?
Modern slavery still exists – and it’s hiding in plain sight.
From the clothes we wear to the food we eat, many everyday products are linked to global supply chains where people are exploited through force, deception or abuse of power. These workers often can't leave, aren't paid fairly, and work in unsafe or inhumane conditions.
WHY THIS MATTERS IN AUSTRALIA
Australia introduced the Commonwealth Modern Slavery Act in 2018 to address exploitation in business supply chains. It was a good first step – but it hasn’t gone far enough.
Right now, large companies are only required to report on the risks of modern slavery but are not required to do anything about it. There are no penalties for ignoring the issue and no obligation to prevent modern slavery from occurring.
This leaves people vulnerable. And it allows companies to profit from exploitation without consequences.
WHY IJM IS CALLING FOR CHANGE
IJM works with local partners around the world to rescue people from slavery and protect communities from violence. But there’s another side of the coin where the demand for cheap goods in wealthy countries like Australia fuels exploitation abroad.
We believe:
- No one should lose their freedom to make the products we use.
- Companies must be held accountable when slavery is found in their supply chains.
- The government must strengthen the law to reflect our values.
THE REALITY: TRANSPARENCY ISN’T ENOUGH
Despite the Modern Slavery Act, the number of people in modern slavery is rising – from 40 million in 2016 to over 50 million in 2021. Australia alone imports around $17.4 billion worth of goods likely made with forced labour, including electronics, clothing, seafood, and solar panels.1
A 2022 report led by the Human Rights Law Centre, Paper Promises, analysed over 100 modern slavery statements and found more than half of these companies failed to identify obvious modern slavery risks in their operations and supply chains.
This research revealed that most companies still fail to:
- Identify clear risks in their supply chains
- Act on those risks, and
- Improve worker conditions.
WHAT NEEDS TO CHANGE?
The Australian government should strengthen the Modern Slavery Act to drive better business practices and protect vulnerable workers by providing:
1. Guidance on high-risk matters ¶
The Australian government should provide guidance on which regions and sectors carry high modern slavery risks and specify how reporting entities should address those risks. One way to do this is by maintaining a current list of industry sectors that are high-risk for forced labour and child labour.
What has the government said so far?
In December 2024, the Australian government agreed in principle with the McMillan Review recommendation tabled in May 2023 that “the Minister or the Anti-Slavery Commissioner may make a written declaration of a region, location, industry, product, supplier or supply chain that is regarded as carrying a high modern slavery risk, and the extent to which reporting entities must have regard to that declaration in preparing their modern slavery statement under the Act”.
In July 2025, the government opened public submissions on the Act and committed to conducting targeted consultations on other topics, including a model for making declarations of high-risk matters. The government has not yet specified a timeframe for these consultations or their implementation under amended legislation.
2. Mandatory human rights due diligence ¶
There should be a duty on reporting entities to take concrete action to address human rights infringements and forced labour drivers that they cause, contribute to, or which are linked to their commercial practices.
The government should extend the transparency premise of the Act to place clear obligations on entities beyond simply describing their processes. The Act needs a legally binding and enforceable standard that requires obligations to carry out robust due diligence across entire supply chain to:
- identify risks
- take action to prevent and mitigate adverse impacts; and
- provide remedies.
The due diligence system must require companies to identify actual occurrences of modern slavery where they occur as well as potential modern slavery risks, to prevent and mitigate those risks, and to bring to an end actual instances of labour rights abuses or minimise their extent.
What has the government said so far?
In December 2024, the Australian government noted the McMillan Review recommendation tabled in May 2023 that “The Modern Slavery Act be amended to provide that a reporting entity must: have a due diligence system that meets the requirements mentioned in rules made under s 25 of the Act, and in the entity’s annual modern slavery statement, explain the activity undertaken by the entity in accordance with that system." The government committed to first undertaking consultations including consideration of how enhanced due diligence requirements on modern slavery would align with broader global developments towards human rights due diligence.
In July 2025, the government opened public submissions on the Act, and committed to conducting targeted consultations on other topics, including introducing obligations for a due diligence system. The government has not yet specified a timeframe for these consultations or their implementation under amended legislation.
3. An enforcement mechanism for non-compliance ¶
The Australian government should enact a civil penalty scheme or enhance the ability for the government to publicly name non-compliant entities. These penalties should target entities that do not submit a statement, provide false or misleading information in their statement, or do not comply with specific guidance or remediation orders from the government. Penalties and consequences of being found to be a non-compliant entity should be proportionate to the size and revenue of the entity and could include restrictions on access to public procurement opportunities from the government. Enforcement mechanisms would give teeth to the currently toothless Modern Slavery Act, which has little to no way of holding entities accountable for non-compliance.
What has the government said so far?
In December 2024, the Australian government agreed in principle, in part with the McMillan Review recommendations tabled in May 2023 that “The Modern Slavery Act be amended to provide that it is an offence for a reporting entity:
- to fail, without reasonable excuse, to give the Minister a modern slavery statement within a reporting period for that entity
- to give the Minister a modern slavery statement that knowingly includes materially false information
- to fail to comply with a request given by the Minister to the entity to take specified remedial action to comply with the reporting requirements of the Modern Slavery Act
- to fail to have a due diligence system in place that meets the requirements set out in rules made under s25 of the Act.”
The government agreed with the need to strengthen enforcement and compliance, and said they would consult on the introduction of civil penalties for:
- Failure to give statement
- False information in statement; and
- Failure to comply with request for remedial action
The government also specified the introduction of a penalty framework would be subject to a future decision of government.
In July 2025, the government produced a consultation paper on the introduction of penalties for non-compliance, with submissions closing on 1 September 2025.
It’s time for Australia to move beyond transparency and take real action. Because freedom is not optional and protecting people from exploitation is urgent.
SURVIVOR LEADERSHIP
Survivors of modern slavery bring lived experience that is essential to shaping effective solutions. Their insights help governments and businesses understand how exploitation happens, and how to stop it.
Survivor leadership must be embedded in Australia’s anti-slavery efforts. This means creating safe, respectful, and ongoing opportunities for survivors to inform policy, guide corporate practices, and hold systems accountable.
One powerful example is the Released Bonded Labourers Association (RBLA) – a survivor-led movement in India with over 2,000 members across four states. RBLA members have successfully advocated for their rights and partnered with local officials to help rescue nearly 300 people from bonded labour.
Australia can learn from this model. When survivors are meaningfully included, solutions become more grounded, more just, and more effective.
TAKE ACTION
We should be able to trust that what we buy has not come at the cost of someone else’s freedom.
Your voice matters.
Sign the petition to strengthen the Modern Slavery Act.
What consumer guides are available to help me make better purchasing decisions?
Baptist World Aid’s Ethical Fashion Guide
Be Slavery Free Chocolate Scorecard
Good On You (ethical shopping app)
Oxfam's 'What She Makes' Tracker
GoodFish Sustainable Seafood Guide
Shop Ethical!